...
AC Chat Transcript: EN/ES
...
Participants:
ES: Sergio Salinas Porto, Harold Arcos, Maritza Aguero, Alexis Anteliz, Johnny Laureano, Eliecer Acevedo, Humberto Carrasco, Vrikson Acosta, Carlos Vera, Javier Chandia, Ricardo Holmquist, Sylvia Herlein Leite, Aida Noblia, Vanda Scartezini, Lito Ibarra, Alejandro Piscanty, Alberto Soto, Fatimata Cambronero, Carlos Leal, Gilberto Lara, Rodrigo Saucedo, Marcelo Telez, Adrian Prado, Lilian Ivette De Luque, Sharon Emptage, Diego Acosta Bastidas , Craig Nesty, Jose Alberto Barrueto Rodriguez , Olga Cavalli,
...
ALAC Policy Activities
See: 2018 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model
The ALAC cited their prior statement from 10 April 2018 relating to the access of WHOIS, and offered (4) general comments on the proposed UAM: (1) Any access model must be compliant with the GDPR, and ICANN should obtain legal advice from expert counsel to confirm compliance; (2) Internet end user rights should be part of the calculus, including knowledge of email sender identity, et al; (3) The UAM design should be scalable and not overly-reliant upon manual updates, and should have a well-defined taxonomy of abuse types, et al. Once an agreed upon set of inputs and outcomes is established, an automated system may be created to respond to WHOIS requests; (4) The various harms taken into account when considering the UAM must be done so in a non-biased fashion.
Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile
The ALAC recommends that ICANN adopt the RDAP quickly and effectively because they hold it is an essential step for ICANN to deploy a tiered-access model adequately. In addition, the ALAC recommends that ICANN address 5 ambiguities in the RDAP that are also present in the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), noting them in the statement.
Next Steps on Reviews
The ALAC supports the proposed path forward for the ATRT3, while stating the consideration of how to streamline specific reviews to make them more effective and impactful is a low priority item for ATRT3. The ALAC encourages active community participation in formulating any recommendations in organizational reviews, and states that specific reviews operating standards should take a minimalist approach.
- Policy Status Report: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP)
- Application for New Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Dispute-Resolution Service Provider
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets | Submitted:
Note: Initial draft submitted to public comment; revised draft to follow after IGF. |
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT) Final Report & Recommendations |
|
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
|