Date: 28 June 2016
Time: 15:25-15:35 UTC
Recordings: See here
Transcript: EN (p 34-42)
Slides: /
GAC Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Input:
- Spain: Nielsen survey would be more representative if users who are average users of Internet had been surveyed as they are more prone to be victims of fraud. Question 1: How can we ensure someone using .BANK is really a bank?
--> It was not a filtering question but a question that was used for cross-tabulation. - Spain: Take into account the conclusion that more than 70% respondents favored some level of registration restrictions on both legacy and new gTLDs as this is an increase from 2015.
- Spain: Survey should have been broader.
- Denmark/UK: Have new gTLD rounds had an impact on cost benefit?
--> Competition/Consumer Choice Team is responsible for the cost benefit analysis. Cost is often in form of defensive registrations although difficult to measure. - Denmark: Will defensive registration be included in the survey and report?
--> We are going to conduct a study of brand owners probably through INTA to get an understanding of costs associated with the new gTLD program. - UK: Will the review look at opportunities for small and medium-size enterprises?'s an experiment to see whether or not a restricted string can lead to an increase in consumer trust that will be taken up by the industry it is meant to represent.
- Kavouss Arasteh: What are the tools that are used for self-evaluation or self-validation?
--> We are develoing the tools now to perform those evaluations. Future reviews might have an easier job because we will have established a lot of parameters used to measure success of programs going forward. - Daniel Ebanks: How do you qualify as an underserved region?
--> We will make our own definitions and seek public input on those so they can be refined, as needed.