Content Comparison

Notes/ Action Items

ACTION ITEMS:

• Staff will check with the support staff of the TPR PDP to ensure that there are no conflicts between the two reports.\

NOTES:

1. Roll Call and SOI Updates (2 min)
2. Welcome and Chair Updates (5 min)
3. Updates from RySG and Continue Discussions on Unresolved Outputs; PR6 and IG7, Outputs 10-12, PR14 and IG15 (45 mins)
   1. The RySG shared approval of updated text for PR6. Also approved by RrSG and ALAC. 
      1. There was a procedural concern raised by multiple members of the team, and the Chair discussed the GNSO Council’s role in this
      2. Rationale was discussed to include updates to the text to include what would have been in IG7
   2. For PR10, a member of the RySG shared that they agree with the language of the recommendation, but would like additional details on how this report will affect other PDPs included in the rationale. 
      1. ACTION ITEM: Staff will check with the support staff of the TPR PDP to ensure that there are no conflicts between the two reports.
   3. For PR14, there was approval for the language from the RySG. 
      1. There is still some 
   4. For IG15, the RySG was agreeable to keeping the item. 
      1. It was discussed how the service that is referenced could be used. ICANN org staff discussed this and will follow up with analysis. 
      2. Additional discussions about the difference in service for existing vs future domain names and the effect on UDRP / URS.
      3. A request was lodged to add information to the rationale on why there is no public service component to the recommendation. 
4. Staff’s Update on Working Document (65mins)
   1. Settle IG2
   2. Summary for Outputs: PR10-20
      1. Output of discussion in individual recommendation pages: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oFX0h_czrJtV0Z_q9haGuVHjnhy4lZyyee-IBWscGBQ/edit?usp=sharing
5. AOB (3 min)
   1. The chair shared an update from ICANN org on the use of the term “grandfathered”
      1. In the past ALAC has used “transitional exceptions” but this was challenged by a member of the RySG.
      2. This document will be circulated and the team will review