Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Fix links.

...

Staff: Matthias Langenegger

Review of Action Items from last meeting

AI: Annalisa will send a list with affordable hotels in the meeting venue area to the NARALO list.

ONGOING

AI: Staff will send out a call for volunteer for the NARALO Showcase WG will be sent out.

...

ONGOING - Alan: this is more time-consuming than expected. There are additional areas that need fixing.

AI: Beau will draft a document in response to the DOC letter

CANCELED Alan: In my view it is no longer necessary to redact a document, the time has passed.

Beau moved, seconded by Alan, to cancel the action item on drafting a response to the DOC letter.

The motion passed unanimously.

Open Public Consultations

AI: Eric will draft a note on the ownership, trust, and economic (legal) barriers to operational data and the importance of data to informed policy making.

...

Alan gave a synopsis of the ALAC statement on Uniform Rapid Suspension.

Review of Cartagena Meeting

Update on ALAC Officer and Liaison Positions

Beau gave a short summary of the ALAC leadership elections in Cartagena. You can find the complete list of the current ALAC members and officers at:http://www.icann.org/en/committees/alac/

Update on ALAC Policy Discussions

A review of ALAC’s policy discussions in Cartagena can be found in the Chair's report from Cartagena.

Update on ICANN developments and important Board decisions

...

Evan: The GNSO resolved that ICANN needs to install a mechanism to deal with objectionable strings. This obviously puts ICANN in a difficult position with regards to the DOC letter. The ICANN Board will eventually have to deal with it. The GAC and the ALAC are both involved in the MAPO issue. At-Large improvements work team A has started drafting possible Bylaw changes to help strengthen ALAC’s institutional role, although the draft modifications are not as detailed as those pertaining to the GAC. Lastly, there is also a small WG drafting alternative Applicant Guidebook text for certain areas. The alternative Guidebook is more user-centric than the actual Applicant Guidebook.

NARALO Input to Work Team C SWOT Analysis

Olivier: Work team C looked at recommendations 5 and 6 of the At-Large improvement recommendations. We were trying to identify specific strengths and weaknesses and hope that each region can provide input on this SWOT analysis from their regional perspective.

See: https://icann-community.icannatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/Improve/NARALO+input+into+WT+C+SWOT+analyses

Gareth: I would like to volunteer to be the conduit for the NARALO

AI: Garteh will collect the input from NARALO to the WT C SWOT analysis.

Update on San Francisco Showcase Working Group

Eduardo: Staff will shortly send out a doodle for the first WG call.

There is also a wiki workspace to plan the SF showcase available under:

https://icann-community.icannatlassian.orgnet/wiki/displayspaces/NARALO/pages/110233205/NARALO+San+Francisco+Showcase+Working+Group

Update from the At-Large Improvements WTs

Annalisa summarized the recent WT B developments.

Annalisa: While it is possible to get an Adobe Connect meeting room from ICANN for your ALS meetings, we at ISCO SF did not find it particularly useful. However, it could help draw in some members in other ALSes perhaps.

...

Annalisa: I would like to note, however, that Stanford is 60 miles away from Union Square. I could certainly help but logistics are challenging. If there are other ICANN events taking place in Silicon Valley there might be shuttles. Otherwise it could prove difficult to get bring the attendees from SF to Stanford university.

Recent and Upcoming Activities of NARALO members

Beau: I am happy to announce that we will produce a document on the consumer constituency in San Francisco.

...