Introduction
• With the JAS report complete, that group will be winding down but it will be necessary for At-Large to monitor its acceptance and implementation (to the extent that it is accepted and implemented)
First thoughts: As we are still waiting for the Board's first words on implementation plan does this go into the background. Also, I understand that the JAS group is still waiting for the response and may wish to respond. It occurs to me that as long as the JAS group remains active, another reason why this activity should be in the background.
Or are there specifically At-large concerns that should be worked out here?
Thoughts?
Avri (11.11.11)
...