Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees: 

Sub-group Members:    Amal Al-saqqaf, Avri Doria, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Dalila Rahmouni, Fiona Asonga, Herb Waye, Jorge Cancio, Rafik Dammak, Renata Aquino RiberiroRibeiro, Sebastien Bachollet   (9)

Observers/Guests:  Amal Al-saqqaf, Julie Hammer   (2)

Staff:  Brenda Brewer, Ergys Ramaj, Karen Mulberry, Meghan Healy, Nathalie Vergnolle   (5)

Apologies:   Lito Ibarra, Lousewies van der Laan

** If your name is missing from attendance or apology, please send note to acct-staff@icann.org **


Transcript

Recording

Agenda

 Roll Call

 Review of Actions items

 Review of Draft questionnaire -  Diversity Questionnaire

- Finalization & sending to CCWG Plenary

- Reaching SO/AC

Strawman document:  moving to initial report drafting 

 AOB

Notes (including relevant portions of chat):

Roll Call

Review of Actions items

·  We'll share the document about Global Account again through the mailing list, and are asking the subgroup to provide input,

·  Action (Nathalie) send a reminder to Chris Gift to send documentation to the subgroup about Global enrollment

·  Action (Sebastien): send an email to the mailing list to summarize the discussion about role of ombuds office in collecting diversity data for those who missed the last call send an email to the mailing list to summarize the discussion about role of ombuds office in collecting diversity data for those who missed the 
last call, and get a conversation going on the mailing list

Review of Draft questionnaire -  Diversity Questionnaire

- Finalization & sending to CCWG Plenary

- Reaching SO/AC 

·  Renata asking that question that was deleted be re-included

·  Julie: questions 1 and 2 have been put back in

·  Renata: I see that they were re-ordered, but are there, so this is good

·  Rafik: there are comments from Corinne, let's see if we can incorporate those comments and finalize the questionnaire

·  Julie: I agree with Corinne about question 4

·  Renata: I think it is clear enough as it is written now Suggest to keep the question as it is.

·  FIONA ASONGA 2: Yes we keep the question

·  Amal Al-saqqaf: maybe we should remove it

·  Sebatien: we don't need to be too specific. Suggest adding the following after the question: "How is it done?"

·  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I do not oppose a follow up question

·  FIONA ASONGA 2: I agree with Sabastien's amendment

·  Julie: that's fine, seems like a majority agrees with this suggestion

·  Action (drafting team): amend the question 4 with the amendment discussed today, and give until Friday for the group to confirm we have reached consensus. 

Strawman document:  moving to initial report drafting 

·  Fiona: we are reformatting the strawman according to the template provided for the report. Asking the group to provide comments about the document.

·  Renata: what is the deadline for this, and do we have a drafting team?

·  Fiona: in terms of timing, the WS2 timeline is that we should start reviewing a 1st draft starting in February, so we are right on time if I manage to circulate a document today. There are several 
elements from recommendation #12 that still need to be discussed. All comments from previous discussions have been included in the report so we are right on time if I manage to 
circulate a document today. There are several elements from recommendation #12 that still need to be discussed. All comments from previous 
discussions have been included in the report

·  Renata: we should discuss more the suggestion to use the office of ombudsman, and should use the month of February to discuss also the other components that we haven and should use the month of February to discuss also the 
other components that we haven't yet discussed.

·  Rafik: to clarify, we haven't had a detailed discussion about the office of diversity. We need to have this discussion, which is why we have an action item about that which is why we have an 
action item about that.

·  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'd be quite clear we need to address the need for a diversity office in ICANN. And how it can work w/ current structures like ombudsman office and this group current structures like 
ombudsman office and this group.

·  Dalila Rahmouni: Yes we need to see all the options for the office

·  Renata: we should think about the visa problem, the problem of accessibility, remote participation, and broad inclusion.

AOB

·  Rafik: We are scheduling the next calls for February, invitations will come out soon.

Documents Presented

Chat Transcript

Yvette Guigneaux: (1/30/2017 18:43) Welcome all to the Diversity Subgroup Meeting #11  |Tuesday, 31 January 2017 @ 13:00 UTC!

  Yvette Guigneaux: (19:19) To mute & unmute phone, please press *6

  Herb Waye Ombuds: (1/31/2017 07:01) Morning all

  Rafik: (07:01) hi everyone

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:03) hi

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:03) yes

  Nathalie Vergnolle: (07:06) yes, I will

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:11) Hi ! Sorry fpr being late

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:11) 1 - Are there any other diversity elements you do not identify on this list?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:11) roughly that

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:11) this is the 1st question which is missing

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:12) yes

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:12) I see now question 2 is that one

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:12) sorry

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:12) yes, it's good

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:14) so 4 will be rewritten according to the comment?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:14) I'd think it is clear enought

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:15) so the comment should not be added

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:16) Thanks Rafik it is agreeable

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:20) Leave the question as it is, it is clear enought

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:20) *enough

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:21) Yes we keep the question

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:21) Disagree on any change

  Amal Al-saqqaf: (07:22) maybe we should remove it

  Amal Al-saqqaf: (07:23) i think it is an analytical question more than a questionaire question

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:23) alll questions are analytical :)

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:23) there was a request once for multiple options questions but was decided it would be open ended

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:24) I do not oppose a follow up question

  Amal Al-saqqaf: (07:24) i mean it'd not have a specific answer i think by the asked group

  Amal Al-saqqaf: (07:25) the other questions are direct

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:25) I agree with Sabastien's amendment

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:27) as the number was supposed to be low, i guess this is it

  Rafik: (07:30) sorry folks, caught cold lately , not in good shape to speak for long time :)

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:30) could tell. get well soon.

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:36) ok thanks

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:36) yes, so we should close this right?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:38) by close i mean incorporate the comments

  Nathalie Vergnolle: (07:38) Correct Rafik, the objective is to have a document ready for 1st reading in Copenhagen

  Nathalie Vergnolle: (07:39) So the subgroup needs to reach consensus during the month of February.

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:40) ok thanks Fiona and Rafik

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:42) Can you repeat Fiona?

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:42) I was not able to attend the last meetings. Sorry Fiona I don't heard you. Can you repeat?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:42) chopped off the call a bit

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:42) yes

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:42) pls

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:43) Fiona, do you make a refeence to the recommandation of the Office?

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:43) yes Dalila

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:44) I was not able to attend the last calls

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:45) so what I understand, it is that the question of the office was discussed in the last calls.

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:45) The strawman document is now transforming to our first report

  Herb Waye Ombuds: (07:45) please let me know if I can be of any assistance

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:46) Fiona yes and then we will continue to see it right?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:46) Herb thanks I believe it will be needed

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:46) Yes Renata

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:46) Fiona thanks

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:46) but in more details

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:47) Notes: we should discuss more the suggestions regarding office of ombudsman and diversity office, and...

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:47) pls amend?

  FIONA ASONGA 2: (07:47) Yes Renata

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:48) Thank you Rafik for this clarification

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:49) I'd be quite clear we need to address the need for a diversity office in ICANN. And how it can work w/ current structures like ombudsman office and this group.

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:49) so I agree w/ Rafik

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:52) Fiona thanks

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:52) Yes we need to seen all the options for the office

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (07:54) apologies I will have to leave the call but will review transcript and try to catch up, also on the mailing list, thanks

  Herb Waye Ombuds: (07:56) Cheers everyone

  avri doria: (07:56) bye

  Amal Al-saqqaf: (07:56) Thank you

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:57) by

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:57) bye

  Dalila Rahmouni: (07:57) thank you