| Comment Close Date | Statement Name | Status | Assignee(s) and | Call for Comments | Call for Comments Close | Vote Announcement | Vote Open | Vote Reminder | Vote Close | Date of Submission | Staff Contact and Email | Statement Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.08.2013 | Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) Requirements | Voting | Unlicensed user Adopted 13Y, 0N, 0A |
| 26.08.2013 | 02.09.2013 | 04.09.2013 00:01 UTC | 04.09.2013 00:01 UTC | 09.09.2013 | 10.09.2013 | 11.09.2013 | Karen Lentz karen.lentz@icann.orgTBC | AL-ALAC-ST-0913-03-01-EN |
...
FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED
The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. Please click here to download a copy of the PDF below.
|
FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC
...
The option of relying on the TLD Registry Operator’s “IDN variant policies” has the disadvantage of resulting in differentiating IDN variant treatment for the same trademark across TLDs, which will cause inconsistent user experience as well as user confusion. Furthermore, the revised requirements for Trademark Claims as they are currently formulated will serve only part of the global IDN user community (see Annex 1 A for elaboration).
Annex A: Why the Trademark Claims Requirement Serves Only Part of the Global IDN User Community
...