Content Comparison

PROPOSED AGENDA

 ACTION ITEM: : By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 2) [BY 02 Jan]  See:

Question 5  (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought)

(a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period?

• Are there any unintended results?

• Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG?

• Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days?

• Are there any disadvantages? 

Draft Agenda: 

1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest

2. Select Sub Team Leader

3. Continue survey analysis

4. . Brief discussion of comments (if any) on the input for the Sunrise Questions already discussed relating to the survey data: Questions 3, 4, 5(b), and 6.

3. Begin analysis of previously collected data with respect to the Claims Charter Questions:

1. Preamble Sunrise Charter Question: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ph-QXnQLWPVXCDVtM8l51r8Nt0Xojil-CR0fU6cupiU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
2. Sunrise Charter Question 1:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zi5rDXEkLGMuuRdSgXncOoPVO3vR783yQQ1JYMHqQz0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]  
3. Sunrise Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k8SXcZRSzluqAVkTxYJL63qbBt_A8e9vZNdoKJp8tFc/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

1. Sunrise Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10npR7b_6WWJZ6J20583GNq2OLM4jBp-sS-Yeq564GwM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
2. Sunrise Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecm9e0jiA6dPsUcACNlHOLgFD5tZPgU3PzF3WtDOdqY/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

4. AOB

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

Sunrise Charter Q5a Review of Analysis Group Survey Results - Google Docs (2 January 2019)

Mp3

AC Recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Notes/ Action Items

 Actions:

Sub Team Homework (see separate Homework email for instructions):

By Wednesday 9 January 2019 at 13:00 UTC, the Sunrise Sub Team is tasked to provide input in the worksheet set up for:

• Sunrise Charter Question 5(a): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cHtWXXy9jh5JsoieFE7VinddaWvGTlaAE58E4ujn_ao/edit?usp=sharing  (for those who haven’t provided input before 2 January)
• Sunrise Preamble Charter Question: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fw2j0gTvXi8lKlt5qELD6i1Ifg7-_9-jFSup8MEmH80/edit?usp=sharing

Notes:

1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates.

2. Select Sub Team Leader:

-- Greg Shatan has volunteered.

-- David McAuley would be willing to talk to Greg if he needs help.

-- Sub Team doesn't necessarily need a Co-Chair.

-- Greg Shatan is confirmed.

3. Continue survey analysis:

See the Google worksheets at: https://icann-community.icannatlassian.orgnet/wiki/x/_oIWBg2xuoBg

On the Comments from Kristine Dorrain:

-- Intended consequence or unintended;   the two different types of sunrise periods was a compromise.  This is a consequence -- the idea that people were confused and didn't understand the difference.  Worth noting in the unintended consequence category.

Greg Shatan's input on George Kirikos' comments:

-- Disagree with the statement "serious statistical problems".

-- Disagree with the statement on "likely skewed the results".

-- If we are talking about negative impact, we shouldn't go too far afield but note what we can't determine from the data.

On the Comments from Griffin:

-- Value to have a single online source to see domain name, start data, end date.

Process Points:

-- How to go from individual opinions to greater agreement?

-- Can raise issues for public comment.

-- No method for consensus in Initial Report, but in Final Report.

-- Can indicate where there is Sub Team agreement on recommendations.