...
4. Special Information Requirements for ALAC Candidates
- A resume (maximum three pages);
- A letter of motivation;
- A Declaration of Interests;
- Responses to 3 questions posed by the Sub-Committee as follows:
- (a) Why do you believe that you are in a position to fairly assess ICANN's mechanisms for accountability, transparency and public input?
- (b) Why do you believe that you are in a position to assess ICANN’s focus on the global public interest?
- (c) Why do you believe that you will be able to do the above from the perspective of the ALAC and the global ICANN At-Large Community?
5. ALAC Candidates and Application Materials
10. ALAC Candidate Applications
- Olivier Crépin-Leblond
- Jean-Jacques Subrenat
- Alan Greenberg
- Daniel A. Reed
...
6.
...
Subjective Ranking 1-5 (5 highest, 1 lowest)
Name of Reviewer: | ||||||
Evaluation Criteria | Proxy Indicators (These are examples. Actual Proxy Indicators to be developed by Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee) | Candidate 1 Name Link to Application | Candidate 2 Name Link to Application | Candidate 3 Name Link to Application | ||
0. Completed application including filed SOI by 5 Dec 2012 |
| Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||
1. Accountability to the ALAC and At-Large | Elected or appointed to the ALAC/Leadership roles |
|
|
| ||
2. Trusted by the Community | Known to the ALAC & At-Large community/Leadership roles with no recall/Extended leadership roles |
|
|
| ||
3. Knowledge of ICANN and its working practices and culture | Years engaging ICANN/Cross-community experiences |
|
|
| ||
4. Knowledge of the Subject Area of Review | Years of experience/Opinion leader or considered as an expert |
|
|
| ||
5. Team spirit, adaptability, consensus-seeking attitude | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
6. Willingness to learn | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
7. Capacity to reason objectively, putting aside personal opinions or preconceptions | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
8. Analytical skills | Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports that required analysis of data/information |
|
|
| ||
9. Ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence | Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports involving complex issues that required an understanding of qualitative and quantitative data |
|
|
| ||
10. Capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
12. Commitment to devote sufficient personal time to review process | Demonstration of sufficient time commitment in other areas of work |
|
|
| ||
| Total Ranking | ||||||
| Overall Comments (optional) | ||||||
4. ALAC ATRT2 Candidate Endorsement Sub-Committee Update
...
Assessment Criteria and Method
Please click here to download a copy of the PDF below.
|
7. Meeting Summaries
Please click here to download a copy of the 19 December 2012 Meeting Summary notes.
|
Please click here to download a copy of the 9 January 2012 Meeting Summary notes.
|
Please click here to download a copy of the 18 January 2012 Meeting Summary notes.
|
Please click here to download a copy of the 23 January 2012 Meeting Summary notes.
|