Content Comparison

PROPOSED AGENDA

Proposed Agenda

Thursday, 20 February 2020 at 14.00 UTC

1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

       2.Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

      3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

          a.Update from legal committee

     4. Timeline review and priority 2 worksheet compilation (see attached) (20 minutes)

           a) Priority 2 worksheet compilation overview

           b) Consider input received to date

           c) EPDP team input

          d) Confirm volunteers for Automation Use Cases Small Team

          e) Confirm next steps

     5. Display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy / proxy providers [docs.google.com] (priority 2) (45 minutes)

          a. EPDP Team to review ICANN Org feedback

          b.Consider Support Staff proposed recommendation

          c. Confirm next steps

     6. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):

          a. Thursday 27 February 2020 at 14.00 UTC (topics: data retention & feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address)

          b. Confirm action items

          c. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

Next steps - priority 2 worksheets - updated 10Feb2020.pdf

Meeting Audio Cast (for observers)

To join the event, click on the link: 

Listen in browser:  http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01

Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u 

Audio Recording

Zoom Recording

Chat Transcript

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Attendance 

Apologies:  Janis Karklins (tentative), Eleeza Agopian (ICANN.Org), Matt Serlin (RrSG)

Alternates: Sarah Wyld (RrSG)

Notes/ Action Items

1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

       2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

       3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

           a. ICANN67 Update

• The ICANN Board announced that ICANN67 will be a remote meeting.

EPDP Team Feedback:

• Would be helpful to ask groups to provide feedback following this announcement – it will likely be difficult to have a 10-hour meeting on a Saturday
• There is value to F2F interactions – the location could be subject to discussion
• Option that makes the most sense – two normal-sized meeting during ICANN67, and another meeting in May
• 10-hour meeting on a Saturday is not viable

          b. ICANN Belgian DPA Update

• See blog post
• Imperative that ICANN org and Janis provide more detail regarding the meeting with the Belgian DPA
• Position of the roles of Janis and Georgios – Janis was there to present the work of the EPDP Team.
• Question: was there any discussion on the DPA reviewing the Initial Report in detail and providing input during the public comment period, or input on the Final Report?
• Blog post was very high level and did not seem to have anything actionable from the EPDP Team’s work
• An important question that needed to be asked was the allocation of liability based on the allocation of processing
• If there is not enough detail in the current draft recommendations, what does that mean? Does it mean there should be more details or are critical details being left to the implementation phase? Perhaps the Team should be more specific in its recommendations. It would be helpful if Janis could provide more detail in a future update.

            c. Update from legal committee

• Legal Committee reviewed the previously-sent legal questions – decided the question regarding reverse look-ups should be removed from consideration since this topic is no longer part of the Initial Report
• Recommended proceeding with the SSAC question re: representations b/w legal vs. natural. (Legal vs. Natural Question 2)
• Did the legal committee consider the issue of instances where the inclusion of personal data is included within a legal person’s contact information?
• Answer: yes
• Legal Committee still reviewing additional questions
• Reminder of the role of the legal committee – it is a representative group and approved questions will be sent to the EPDP Team as an FYI, but not for approval. All members of the EPDP Team may channel questions/concerns through their dedicated legal committee rep.

      4. Timeline review and priority 2 worksheet compilation (20 minutes)

          a) Priority 2 worksheet compilation overview

• EPDP Leadership and Support Staff have compiled the remaining Priority 2 issues, which includes both suggested dates when the Team will discuss the topic as well as leadership-proposed paths forward, where applicable.
• The compilation includes links to the Priority 2 worksheets, which were populated as a result of small team calls. All EPDP Team members should review the Priority 2 worksheets in detail, as they include details regarding expected deliverables, required reading, etc.
• Action: EPDP Team to review the compilation overview in detail and flag any concerns, alternative proposals, etc. EPDP Team members are encouraged to provide feedback in advance of the scheduled date for discussion.

          b) Consider input received to date

          c) EPDP team input

          d) Confirm volunteers for Automation Use Cases Small Team

          e) Confirm next steps

      5. Display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy / proxy providers (priority 2) (45 minutes)

          a. EPDP Team to review ICANN Org feedback

• During Phase 1 deliberations, the EPDP Team was unsure whether one could tell if a domain name is a privacy or proxy registration by looking at the output. The answer to the question that the P/P recommendations would include a recommendation that would lead to a clear indication in the RDDS response if the registration was a P/P service.
• This is a concern that all accredited P/P providers will be visible in RDDS – this has been addressed, and the recommendation as proposed by staff.
• There is doubt that the accreditation program for these services is still needed – the recommendation should be that the PDP should be reopened to reassess the recommendations of that group
• It’s a giant leap of faith to assume that P/P services will be deactivated

         b. Consider Support Staff proposed recommendation

• No EPDP Team objections expressed on the call over Support Staff’s proposal for P/P services.
• Action: EPDP Team to review the proposed recommendation in detail and flag objections on the list by Thursday, 27 February.

         c. Confirm next steps

      6. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):

         a. Thursday 27 February 2020 at 14.00 UTC (topics: data retention & feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address)

         b. Confirm action items

         c. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any