Versions Compared

Version Old Version 1 New Version Current
Changes made by

Charla Shambley

Fiona Asonga

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
What worked well?  What did not work well?  What adjustments had to be made?
Cross Cutting Issues
  What processes have been established for implementing and overseeing recommendations of the review teams?What did ICANN  learn?What worked well?  What did not work well?  What adjustments had to be made?What improvements were made in the subsequent review processes?How did staff and Board ensure that public interest was addressed after the implementation was completed?What Metrics or success criteria was established?  How processes can   be verified in an accountable and transparent way?What review methods for continual assessment have been considered and adopted/ applied?How has efficiency, effectiveness and legitimacy been factored into the review processesTo what extend has transparency been factored in as a default condition?How ICANN can be effective and efficient while improving full multi-stakeholder participation, accountability and transparency?
 Key Issues          
1Looking at the recommendations of the three other groups – ICANN’s interpretation of review team recommendations – ICANN’s implementation of the recommendations.  Asking the question: “Does it satisfy the standard outlined in the affirmation?”          
2Review the Board and staff process used to review, implement and oversee recommendations of review teams.          
3Review actions of the Board and staff in ensuring public interest          
4Accountability + Transparency = Legitimacy towards Governments and the larger Internet.  How is ICANN outreach doing?  Where it going?          
            
          
  Questions          
            
 1What processes have been established for implementing and overseeing recommendations of the review teams?       2What did you learn?    
   3       4What improvements were made in the subsequent review processes?  
     5How did staff and Board ensure that public interest was addressed after the implementation was completed?