...
| Assessment Category | Rating |
|---|
The Charter/Mission of the WG where:
1-Highly Ineffective means confusing, vague, ill-structured, unbounded, unrealistic (e.g., time, constraints), unachievable; and
7-Highly Effective means understandable, clear, well-structured, bounded, realistic (e.g., time, constraints), achievable | |
The Expertise of WG members where:
1-Highly Ineffective means novice, elementary, inapplicable, unusable; and
7-Highly Effective means knowledgeable, advanced, applicable, usable | |
The Representativeness of WG members where:
1-Highly Ineffective means narrow, skewed, selective, unbalanced; and
7-Highly Effective means broad, diverse, balanced | |
The external Human Resources (e.g., briefings, experts, consultants, liaisons) provided to the WG where:
1-Highly Ineffective means inappropriate, inadequate, untimely, not helpful/useful; and
7-Highly Effective means appropriate, adequate, timely, helpful/useful | |
The Technical Resources (e.g., systems, tools, platforms, templates) provided to and utilized by the WG where:
1-Highly Ineffective means difficult, challenging, clumsy, awkward, tedious, slow, not helpful/useful; and
7-Highly Effective means easy, straightforward, clear, efficient, fast, helpful/useful | |
The Administrative Resources (e.g., support, guidelines, documentation) provided to and utilized by the WG where:
1-Highly Ineffective means inappropriate, inadequate, untimely, not helpful/useful; and
7-Highly Effective means appropriate, adequate, timely, helpful/useful | |
| Comments about the WG's Inputs: | (Free-form Text Box) |
III. Processes ...includes norms, operations, logistics, and decision-making.
...
| Assessment Category | Rating |
The Participation climate within the WG where:
1-Highly Ineffective means inhospitable, unilateral, frustrating, unproductive; and
7-Highly Effective means inviting, democratic, accepting, respectful, productive | |
The Behavior of WG members where:
1-Highly Ineffective means disruptive, argumentative, disrespectful, hostile, domineering; and
7-Highly Effective means accommodating, respectful, collaborative, consensus-building | |
The Decision-Making Methodology (consensus)where:
1-Highly Ineffective means broken, ignored, not observed, disrespected; and
7-Highly Effective means honored, followed, observed, respected | |
The Session/Meeting Planning (Agenda) where:
1-Highly Ineffective means disorganized, haphazard, unstructured, untimely notice; and
7-Highly Effective means organized, disciplined, structured, timely notice | |
| Comments about the WG's Processes: | (Free-form Text Box) |
IV. Products and Outputs
...
| Assessment Category | Rating |
|---|
The Working Group's primary Mission where:
1-Highly Ineffective means not achieved and/or accomplished per the Charter; and
7-Highly Effective means completely achieved and/or accomplished as directed | |
The Quality of the WG's outputs (a.k.a. deliverables) where:
1-Highly Ineffective means incomplete, inadequate, materially deficient/flawed, unsupported; and
7-Highly Effective means complete, thorough, exhaustive, reasoned, supported | |
| Comments about the WG's Products and Outputs: | (Free-form Text Box) |
V. Personal Fulfillment and Demographics
...
| Assessment Category | Rating |
|---|
My personal Participation in helping the WG achieve its mission where:
1-Highly Ineffective means immaterial, negligible, insignificant, unimportant
7-Highly Effective means material, substantial, significant, important | |
My personal Fulfillment considering the time, energy, and work efforts I contributed to this WG:
1-Highly Unrewarding; and
7-Highly Rewarding | |
| How did you learn about the WG? | Please select one from the drop-down list: - I was informed or invited by my SG/C or ICANN-affiliated organization
- I was contacted by an ICANN Staff member
- I was contacted by an individual seeking to recruit volunteers for the WG (e.g., GNSO Councilor, interim Chair)
- I learned about the WG through one of ICANN's websites (or Wikis)
- I learned about the WG from another organization not directly associated with ICANN
- A professional colleague or associate informed me about the WG
- Other (please describe): _________________________________
|
| Approximately how long have you been involved with ICANN: | Please select one from the drop-down list: - Less than 1 year
- 1 - 2 years
- 2 - 4 years
- 4 - 6 years
- 6 - 8 years
- More than 8 years
|
| Considering the most recent twelve months, on average, approximately how many hours per week do you spend on ICANN-related activities: | Please select one from the drop-down list: - Less than 10 hours
- 10 - 20 hours
- 20 - 40 hours
- 40 - 60 hours
- 60 - 80 hours
- More than 80 hours
|
| Comments about Personal Fulfillment and Demographics: | (Free-form Text Box) |
Additional Comments:
(Please feel free to provide any additional comments feedback about your Working Group experience,
this Self-Assessment, or any other matter not covered elsewhere in this questionnaire:) | (Free-form Text Box) |
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK!
...