...
| Info |
|---|
In the next three sections (II, III, and IV), you will be asked to rate the EFFECTIVENESS of each dimension; the scale interpretation will be provided appropriate to each element. |
II. Norms and Operations
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working
...
Group's Norms and Operations, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
| Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||
The overall Participation and Collaboration environment Participation climate within the WG where: |
| ||||||||
| The Behavior of WG members where: 1-Highly Ineffective means any/all of the following: disruptive, argumentative, disrespectful, hostile, domineering; and 5-Highly Effective means any/all of the following: accommodating, respectful, collaborative, consensus-building |
| ||||||||
The overall Representativeness of the Working Group where: |
| ||||||||
The overall Decision-Making & Consensus Methodology Making Methodology (consensus)where: |
| ||||||||
| Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
III. Logistics and Requirements
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working
...
Group's Logistics and Requirements, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
| Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The overall Session/Meeting Planning (Agenda) where: |
| ||||||
The Communication/Collaboration Tools provided to and utilized by the WG where: |
| ||||||
The Briefings and Subject Matter Experts provided to the WG where: |
| ||||||
| Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
...
IV. Products and Outputs
Thinking about the EFFECTIVENESS of the Working GoupGroup's Products and Outputs, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
| Assessment Category | Rating | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Achievement of the Working Group's primary Mission where: |
| | ||||||||
| The Quality of the WG's outputs (a.k.a. deliverables) where: 1-Highly Ineffective means incomplete, inadequate, seriously deficient/flawed, unsupported; and 5-Highly Effective means any/all of the following: complete, thorough, reasoned, supported |
| |||||||||
| Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
...
| Please feel free to provide any additional comments about your Working Group experience, this Self-Assessment, or any other matter not covered elsewhere in this questionnaire: | (Free-form Text Box) |
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK!
***END***