Versions Compared

Version Old Version 3 New Version 4
Changes made by

Ken Bour

Ken Bour

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Panel

Anonymity Provision: Although this assessment instrument is requesting personal identifying information, it is being done ONLY as a preventive measure to ensure that (a) all WG Members' input has been received and (b) any spurious or duplicate entries do not undermine or contaminate the value of the feedback to the Chartering Organization. Please be assured that: (1) your individual responses will not be accessible by anyone other than the ICANN Staff Administrator; and (2) they will not be disclosed or published in a way that could be matched to your identity without your express permission. 

Name: 
Email: 
OrganizationOrganization:

Please select one from the drop-down list:

    • Registry Stakeholder Group
    • Registrar Statkeholder Group
    • Business Constituency
    • Intellectual Property Constituency
    • Internet Services Provider Constituency
    • Non-Commercial Users Constituency
    • Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency
    • At-Large/ALAC
    • Other ICANN SO/AC
    • Representing Self
    • Other (please describe): _____________________
Working Group Role:

Please select one from the drop-down list:

    • Leader (Chair, Co-Chair, Vice-Chair, Other Officer)
    • Contributing Member
    • Liaison
    • Observer
    • Advisor/Consultant
    • Support (e.g., secretary, technical, administrative)
    • Other (please describe): _____________________
Info

In the next three sections (II, III, and IV), you will be asked to rate the EFFECTIVENESS of each dimension; the scale interpretation will be provided appropriate to each element:.

II. Norms and Operations

Thinking about the EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Goup's Norms and Operations, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:

...