Date: Thursday, 16 July 2020
...
Meeting Number: AL.AP/CC.0120/1
...
How do I participate in this meeting?
English Conference ID = 1638
...
Zoom room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/96507165518?pwd=NWlDSkFTOGt6S29vMXRYUE9xVkdmQT09 / Password: 6t&.MuzWgY
...
Action Items: EN
Chat: EN
...
Participants
EN: Satish Babu, Maureen Hilyard, Holly Raiche, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Lianna Galstyan, Pavan Budhrani, Amrita Choudhury, Priyatosh Jana, Gopal Tadepalli, Amal Al-Saqqaf, Suhaidi Hassan, Prateek Pathak, Hanan Khatib, Jenna Fung, Kaili Kan, Namrata Khetrapal, Amir Qayyum, Bikram Shrestha, Fouad Bajwa, Jaewon Son
...
| Newly Certified (0) | None | None |
| Pending ALAC Vote (0) | None | None |
| Awaiting RALO Feedback (0) | None | None |
| Processing Due Diligence (1) | #315 Cyber Jagrithi and Safety Foundation | None |
| On Hold (3) | #299/308 China Internet Development Foundation - APRALO (Withdrawn and reapplied under new structure) #267 Surabhi Softwares #112 Arab Regional ISPs & DSPs Association (ARISPA) - APRALO | None |
...
Recently Ratified by the ALAC (since last APRALO Monthly meeting)
ccNSO PDP3: Initial Proposals for Process to Retire ccTLDs
As a whole, the ALAC supports the ccNSO PDP3. From an end user perspective, the ALAC suggested two points to be considered: 1) As a user of the Internet, the removal of a TLD will mean less likelihood for confusion as usually a ccTLD would be removed to make way for a new one. This enhances Trust in the domain name identifiers; 2) As a domain name registrant, the retirement of the ccTLD could pose a problem when correspondents are accustomed to use the "old" address using the obsolete ccTLD. Some companies have built a brand around the "old" ccTLD.
Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1: Proposed Final Report
The ALAC strongly supports the SSAC in proceeding with Studies 2 and 3, and it also strongly urges the ICANN Board and ICANN Org/OCTO to take the necessary action to facilitate the conduct and funding of the NCAP Studies 2 and 3 in a manner agreeable by the SSAC.
Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan
The ALAC supports the five strategic objectives of the Draft PTI Strategic Plan, and strategies to achieve those objectives. The ALAC particularly supported the following elements: Awareness of PTI's mandate and remit, alignment of ICANN and PTI’s Strategic and Financial Plans, and input into the development of ICANN policies.
ICANN Africa Regional Plan for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 AFRALO Statement
The AFRALO statement was in response to the ICANN Africa Regional Plan for Fiscal Years 2021-2025. As all AFRALO countries fall under the Africa Regional Plan, a drafting team from the region provided feedback on strategy topics such as security, ICANN governance, unique identifiers system, geopolitics, and financials.
Note: Ratified by the AFRALO Leadership Team and the ALAC.
Addendum to the Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2
The ALAC commented on the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2, via a comprehensive Public Comment Google form. The ALAC provided feedback on related issues such as display of information, legal versus natural persons, privacy, et al. For all recommendations not listed in the ALAC statement, the ALAC noted that they they “Support as written”.
None
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Assigned Working Group | Penholder(s) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) Regional Strategic Plan for FY2021-2025 LACRALO Statement |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report Join the webinars on the ATRT3 Final Report on 15 July 2020 @ 15:30 UTC and 16 July @ 07:00 UTC. Details on how to join here: https://go.icann.org/2Ztc96M |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 4 (RZ-LGR-4) |
|
|
| Drafting team member(s): Bill Jouris (TBC) |
...
- See the Post-ICANN68 Policy Report here: https://go.icann.org/post68
- The updated Consensus Playbook can be downloaded here: http://go.icann.org/consensus and is also on At-Large PDP 3.0 Workspace.
4. ALAC Updates (Maureen, 10 min)
5. ICANN68 Debrief (Satish, 10 min)
6. APRALO Election Results (Heidi, 5 min)
7. APRALO Updates (Satish, 10 min)
8. NomCom Update (Amrita, 5 min)
...