| Table of Contents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
ICANN Launches the Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (8 Jan 2024)
As of 12 December 2023, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) community and leadership have appointed their representatives to the Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG). The group is being convened to help evolve ICANN Organizational Reviews into a CIP to implement Recommendation 3.6 of the Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3). The development of a CIP is part of a larger effort to enhance the effectiveness of the ICANN multistakeholder model, and is also in furtherance of the ICANN Interim President and CEO Goal 11 related to the management and refinement of Reviews. The CIP-CCG will:
- Develop a shared understanding of the meaning of continuous improvement in the context of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6,
- Consider a range of methodologies for effective CIPs,
- Agree on the methodology that is fit for ICANN purpose, and
- Formulate a CIP Framework, to be used by each of the Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs), and the Nominating Committee (NomCom).
The ICANN community has demonstrated great interest in contributing to the evolution of Organizational Reviews into a CIP, with 21 out of 22 of the groups across the ICANN community represented in the CIP-CCG, including:
- For Asian, Australasian, and Pacific Islands Regional At-Large Organization (APRALO): Amrita Choudhury (representative), Justine Chew (alternate).
APRALO's CIP Submission
On 18 April 2024, the APRALO Leadership Team called for the establishment of an APRALO CIP Small Team to work on APRALO's CIP Submission to the CIP-CCG.
...
Overview of APRALO’s Continuous Improvement Program Submission
5 PRINCIPLES | —> 20 CRITERIA ——> | 61 SMART INDICATORS | |||||
Fulfilling purpose | Fulfilling purpose, contributing to ICANN mission | Contributing to global public interest | Contributes to ICANN Strategic Plan (FY21-25) especially MSM governance | ||||
Effective structure | Has WG, processes to address annual goals, priorities | Process(es) in place is (are) accessible and clearly communicated. | Processes for assessing, measuring output | ||||
Efficient operations | Processes promote planning, setting priorities, identify emerging issues | Assesses input to scope of responsibility | Develops and recommends internal and external outputs for its purpose | Workload managed | Nurtures consensus within membership | Appropriate level of funding support | |
Accountable internally & externally | Accountable to membership in recruiting, development, maintenance | Support and resources for recruiting and onboarding newcomers | Maintaining skill sets, technical expertise needed through capacity building | Maintaining levels of active participation | Maintain sufficient levels of utility and transparency | ||
Implemented
Implemented prior review recommendations | Processes to assess, prioritize and implement CIP outputs | ||||||
Collaborates to further ICANN mission & MSM | Processes for communicating & coordinating within ICANN | Note: The criteria identified above may not be numbered consecutively because the APRALO CIP Small Team recommends either consolidation or dropping of some criteria from an original list of 33 criteria to avoid repetition and which can be addressed using common indicators. | |||||
The APRALO CIP Small Team
...