Date: Thursday, 16 April 2020
...
Zoom room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/298117363?pwd=bVpnYnBrRzNSNG9TWERSMUM2dWltZz09 / Password: 185250
...
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN, ZH
...
EN: Maureen Hilyard, Satish Babu, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Holly Raiche, Gopal Tadepalli, Shreedeep Rayamajhi, Jeawon Jaewon Son, Aris Ignacio, Mubashir Sargana, Alan Greenberg, Amrita Choudhury, Hanan Khatib, Jahangir Hossain, Gunela Astbrink, Leon Sanchez, Suhaidi Hassan, Syuzan Marukhyan, Justine Chew, Ali AlMeshal, Aisyah Shakirah, Amal Al-Saqqaf, Jahangir Hossain, Lianna Galstyan, Mieke Taoi, Amir Qayyum, Nadira Al-Araj, Prateek Pathak, Priyatosh Jana, Vivek Rana, Winthrop Yu, Decka David, Pavan Budhrani
...
ALAC Feedback to PIR Public Comment Proceeding
Note: Not an ICANN Public Comment. The Public Interest Registry (PIR) held a Public Comment proceeding on the issue of the ISOC/PIR. (8) responses were submitted on behalf the ALAC to the PIR Public Comment proceeding.
The ALAC made several suggestions to PIR regarding the issue of ISOC/PIR. The ALAC noted that PICs are the best mechanism with which to enshrine the essential characteristics of a .ORG registry, yet there are significant issues with PIC enforcement that need to be addressed for PICs to be considered a trustworthy assurance. They noted that from the standpoint of an "individual end user," a 10 annual price cap would add a lot of predictability. The ALAC also noted that the stewardship council for .ORG is a good start, but its mandate should be wider than just free speech and privacy, and suggested a few board seats reserved for 501c(3) organizations, chosen by the community, would be more powerful. Reserving certain seats to be selected by NPOC and perhaps the ALAC (to represent the individual registrants) would help a great deal.
...