Content Comparison

Notes/ Action Items

Actions:

1. INTA Survey: Per the question about the full INTA Survey Report, this was provided to the WG in August 2017 and was posted to the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2017-08-31+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG.
2. By Tuesday, 19 February at 17:00 UTC (see instructions in previous email), the Trademark Claims Sub Team is tasked to: 

1. Review the INTA New gTLD Impact Study Survey Result in the ‘Source’ tab of the analysis tool; provide input in the Google Docs set up for ALL Trademark Claims Charter Questions. 
2. Provide further input on the source documents assigned for the previous weeks, if any, in the Google Docs set up for all Trademark Claims Charter Questions.   

Source Documents:

Newly Assigned

1. INTA Survey Final Report by Nielsen (including the original survey questions in the appendix):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/INTA%20Cost%20Impact%20Report%20revised%204-13-17%20v2.1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500376749000&api=v2

2. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the CCT RT (May 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/ICANN%20New%20gTLD%20Survey%20Update%2010May%20Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1501098808000&api=v2

3. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the RPM WG (August 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69277722/INTA%20New%20gTLD%20Cost%20Impact%20Study%20Presentation%20-%2030%20Aug.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1504147055000&api=v2

Previously Assigned 

1. Registry Operator Responses to Initial Survey from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Registry%20Responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20-%2013%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

2. Deloitte responses to initial questions from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team:  https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Deloitte%20responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Gathering%20Sub%20Team%20questions%20-%20Jan%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

3. Deloitte TMCH Report: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170311/e28abe0e/ICANNTMCHreport_Feb2017-0001.pdf

4. Response to follow up questions - Apr 2017:  https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170414/4591dc7c/DeloitteResponsestoFollowUpQuestions-0001.pdf

5. Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Analysis%20Group%20Revised%20TMCH%20Report%20-%20March%202017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490349029000&api=v2

6. AG Response to follow up questions - June 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-June/002043.html

7. AG Response to follow up questions - July 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170727/06a0c33e/ResponsesfromAGtoFollowUpQuestions-27July2017-0001.pdf

Google Docs:

• Claims Charter Question 1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIdqJc89FkVStHuceMBeShWVWD0JRD185FY5ZUjySLo/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]  
• Claims Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P2mckW_nLHiyffxLhT6h2NCWfpjwAcXQ4zjG1-c2sac/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10R4qNC_2zEoLs-0C8_yylxavy6UApOXO7temzue6MJg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qS4ZzkfVQXxtyjj0vPuq_B85UsV8ivwr5YKKbWhex5E/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wrnU1X98UE89muaDDvrYfgdPhuBXHuH6VBIO07ebtMM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs):  No updates provided.

2. Review the Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services and AG’s responses with respect to the Claims Charter Questions:

2.1 Claims Charter Question 1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIdqJc89FkVStHuceMBeShWVWD0JRD185FY5ZUjySLo/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] 

-- Note additional comments from George Kirikos are forthcoming.

-- We are seeing likely unintended consequences.

-- Take into consideration the AG's statements about the poor data they have, so don't know if we can rely on their conclusions.

-- Don't know about the proportions of bad-faith registrants.  Don't have evidence of how the policy is working and effect on bad-faith registrants.

2.2 Claims Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P2mckW_nLHiyffxLhT6h2NCWfpjwAcXQ4zjG1-c2sac/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

2.3 Claims Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10R4qNC_2zEoLs-0C8_yylxavy6UApOXO7temzue6MJg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Consider the use of ordinary words when redrafting the claims notice language.

-- Seems agreement on redrafting the claims notice language.

2.4 Claims Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qS4ZzkfVQXxtyjj0vPuq_B85UsV8ivwr5YKKbWhex5E/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Seems to be data answering the questions.

-- But not sure that we can rely on the AG conclusions.

2.5 Claims Charter Question 5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wrnU1X98UE89muaDDvrYfgdPhuBXHuH6VBIO07ebtMM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Some examples might be relevant -- page 7 (marks in latin script) and could be relevant for geoTLDs, such as .moscow.