...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA ACTION ITEM: : By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 2) [BY 02 Jan] See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Draft Agenda: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest 2. Select Sub Team Leader 3. Continue survey analysis 2. Brief discussion of comments (if any) on the input for the Sunrise Questions already discussed relating to the survey data: Questions 3, 4, 5(b), and 6.
3. Begin analysis of previously collected data with respect to the Claims Charter Questions:
4. AOB BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Sunrise Charter Q5a Review of Analysis Group Survey Results - Google Docs (2 January 2019) |
...