Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Info

PROPOSED AGENDA


ACTION ITEM: By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 1 and its sub questions (a) and (b), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 1) [BY 02 Jan]  See:

Question 1 (Final Charter Questions for Trademark Claims) Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect? Consider the following questions specifically in the context both of a Claims Notice as well as a Notice of Registered Name:

a) Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect of deterring bad-faith registrations and providing Claims Notice to domain name applicants?

b) Is the Trademark Claims service having any unintended consequences, such as deterring good-faith domain name applications?

Draft Agenda:

1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest

2. Select Sub Team Leader

3. Continue survey analysis

4. AOB

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS


Claims Charter Q1 Review of Analysis Group Survey Results (2 January 2019) - Google Docs

Info
titleRECORDINGS

Mp3

AC Recording



Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Attendance and AC Chat

Apologies: Justine Chew

...