Content Comparison

PROPOSED METRIC SECTION ***STAFF USE ONLY: PLEASE DO NOT EDIT***

1

Metric Description:

Text data

name	DESC

2

Notes/Comments:

Text data

name	NOTES

3

AoC Category:

List data

name	CAT

List option

sortValue	A
value	Consumer Trust (CT)

List option

sortValue	B
value	Consumer Choice (CC)

List option

sortValue	C
value	Competition (C)

4

SO/AC Originator:

List data

name	ORIG

List option

sortValue	A
value	ALAC

List option

sortValue	B
value	GNSO

STAFF INFORMATION/ANALYSIS SECTION

5

Staff Team:

List data

name	STAFF

List option

sortValue	A
value	Registry

List option

sortValue	B
value	Registrar

List option

sortValue	C
value	CTCCC Team

List option

sortValue	D
value	Compliance

List option

sortValue	E
value	Legal

List option

sortValue	F
value	Tech Services

6

Metric Currently Measured?

List data

name	MEASURED

List option

sortValue	A
value	No

List option

sortValue	B
value	Yes

7

Computation:
(e.g., data elements, formula, numerator, denominator, ratio/percent, periodicity/frequency)

Text data

name	CALC

8

Data Owner:
(i.e., party responsible for collecting and publishing metric)

Text data

name	OWNER

9

Data Reference Source:
(i.e., how/where is the data collected, tracked, managed, and published/produced?)

Text data

name	SOURCE

10

Targets:

SLA:

Text data

name	SLA

3-Year:

Text data

name	TARGET

11

Implementation Considerations:
(e.g., what new or additional resources, tasks, activities, systems, et al., whether internal or external, would be needed to develop, capture, and report this metric?)

Text data

name	IMPLEM

12

Degree of Difficulty/Impact:
(i.e., net impact on existing ICANN resources, systems, and capabilities)

List data

name	IMPACT

List option

sortValue	A
value	Negligible

List option

sortValue	B
value	Nominal

List option

sortValue	C
value	Moderate

List option

sortValue	D
value	Significant

List option

sortValue	E
value	Extraordinary

13

Estimated Development Cost ($M):

Internal

External

List data

name	DEVCOST-I

List option

sortValue	A
label	$0 or N/A
value	1

List option

sortValue	B
label	< $.1M
value	2

List option

sortValue	C
label	$.1M - .3M
value	3

List option

sortValue	D
label	$.3M - .5M
value	4

List option

sortValue	E
label	$.5M - 1.0M
value	5

List option

sortValue	F
label	$1.0M - 2.0M
value	6

List option

sortValue	G
label	> $2.0M
value	7

List data

name	DEVCOST-E

List option

sortValue	A
label	$0 or N/A
value	1

List option

sortValue	B
label	< $.1M
value	2

List option

sortValue	C
label	$.1M - .3M
value	3

List option

sortValue	D
label	$.3M - .5M
value	4

List option

sortValue	E
label	$.5M - 1.0M
value	5

List option

sortValue	F
label	$1.0M - 2.0M
value	6

List option

sortValue	G
label	> $2.0M
value	7

14

Estimated Ongoing Production Costs:
(i.e., incremental to existing funded/budgeted expenditures)

Internal

External

Number data

name	BUDGET-I
format	$#,###,###

Number data

name	BUDGET-E
format	$#,###,###

15

Estimated Net Incremental Staff (FTE):
(Express as a fraction and/or range, e.g., .25 - .50)

Text data

name	FTE
type	line

16

Itemization of Staff Work Effort:
(i.e., list of tasks/activities to support FTE calculation in Q15)

Text data

name	WORKEFFORT

17

Rough Implementation Timeframe:
(e.g., indicate major steps and months/years to complete each one)

Internal

External

Text data

name	TIMEFRAME-I

Text data

name	TIMEFRAME-E

18

Critical Dependencies:

Text data

name	DEPENDENCIES

19

Anticipated Challenges/Risks:

Text data

name	CHALLENGES

METRIC EFFECTIVENESS AND UTILITY SECTION

20

Explanation of Metric Effectiveness:
(i.e., how will success/failure enable conclusions to be drawn concerning the relevant AoC definition?)

Text data

name	UTILITY

21

Metric Effectiveness Assessment:
(i.e., vis a vis AoC definition)

List data

name	EFFECTIVENESS

List option

sortValue	A
value	Not Effective

List option

sortValue	B
value	Partially Effective

List option

sortValue	C
value	Effective

List option

sortValue	D
value	Moderately Effective

List option

sortValue	E
value	Highly Effective

22

Overall Feasibility Assessment:

Panel

bgColor	lightyellow
titleColor	maroon
titleBGColor	lightcyan
title	LEGEND

Poor: Low Effectiveness - High Cost
Weak: Low Effectiveness - Low Cost
Potential: High Effectiveness - High Cost
Optimal: High Effectiveness - Low Cost

List data

name	FEASIBILITY

List option

sortValue	A
value	Poor

List option

sortValue	B
value	Weak

List option

sortValue	C
value	Potential

List option

sortValue	D
value	Optimal

=======================================

...

Version	Old Version 1	New Version 2
Changes made by	Ken Bour	Ken Bour
Saved on	Nov 18, 2013	Nov 18, 2013

Versions Compared

Key