Content Comparison

...

1. Welcome
2. Roll Call
3. Statements of Interest
4. Responses (if any) From SO/ACs
5. Refinements to Proposed Questions
6. Working MetholodyMethodology
7. AOB

...

Actions:

1. Think about possible scenarios and check on those that the EWG used in its reports - pay attention to difference between literal and figurative translationProposed Questions (see below): Ask WG members to continue to suggest refinements on the list and the wiki. ADD question on difference between verification and validation

2. Responses from SO/ACs:

   a) Staff will send reminders to the SOs/ACs to give responses as early as possible, or indicate if they need more time, or whether they want to join the PDP WG face-to-face meeting in Singapore;

   b) Rudi will reach out to Olivier concerning a meeting with the ALAC in Singapore.

   c) Rudi also will reach out to a colleague on the ccNSO.

3. Study Group to Evaluate Available Solutions for the Submission and Display of Internationalized Contact Data: The WG will consider whether it will provide input on the survey that has gone out to the registrars and registries.

...

For Review: TBD

...

Proposed Questions:

1.  What is contact information (review and expand on the taxonomies)?
2. Why are we doing this?; is this particular feature necessary?
3. Who gets access to what?
4. Who are the stakeholders?; who is affected? and what do they want (linking back to What)?
5. How much would a particular feature cost and how to weigh the costs versus the benefits?
6. When would policy come into effect?
7. What should be mandatory?
8. What is the difference between verification and validation?

...

Related Links:

1.  WHOIS Review Team Internationalized Registration Data Expert Working Group: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisird/WHOIS+RT+IRD+WG+Home
2. Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services