Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Note
titleRecommendation 32

That ICANN define “cultural diversity” and that relevant metrics (encompassing geographic, gender, age group and cultural, possibly by using birth language) be monitored and published. 

Working Party (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness): CG - Accept with modification: Such metrics should be used with caution, understanding that it may be impossible in some cases to have broad demographic representation.  The RySG is an example of this; members must have a gTLD registry agreement with ICANN and to date there have not been many gTLD registries from at least two of ICANN’s geographic regions.
Staff (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness):
  •  Accept As-Is
  •  Accept With modification
  •  Reject

Rationale:

MK: Accept as-is, although it would be helpful to define who 'ICANN' is in this context. Is the ICANN Board expected to undertake this initiative with the involvement of all SO/ACs? Is this expected to be a staff-led effort?

Basis for Assessment: 
Work in Progress:

CCWG-Accountability has had recent discussions on the topic of diversity (see http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp3/2015-July/000019.html).

Expected Completion Date for Work in Progress: 
Milestones: 
Responsibility: 

 

 

Recent updates
typespage, comment
max5
themesocial