| Note | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
That, when approving the formation of a PDP WG, the GNSO Council require that its membership represent as far as reasonably practicable the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Additionally, that when approving GNSO Policy, the ICANN Board explicitly satisfy itself that the GNSO Council undertook these actions when approving the formation of a PDP WG. |
| Working Party (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness): | |
|---|---|
| Staff (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness): |
Rationale: MK: Accept with modification. This is aligned with current requirements, although a definition would need to be provided as what is considered representative of the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Also, the recommendations does not take into account that some participate in a PDP WG as representatives of a group in which such diversity may be present - should that also be factored in when making this assessment? |
| Basis for Assessment: | |
| Work in Progress: | Current practice as specified in GNSO rules & WG Guidelines |
| Expected Completion Date for Work in Progress: | |
| Milestones: | |
| Responsibility: | Council/WG chairs |
| Recent updates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|