Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Some proposals of parameters for decertification:
    • An ALS that has been in a "Standby" status for one entire year, and didn't give valid reasons for that situation should be considered for decertification
    • Before proceeding in the decertification process, the RALO Chair or another designated RALO member officially contacts the ALS representatives for a last trial (with the AFRALO list in copy) to bring it back to the RALO activities.
    • If, 6 months after the trial, the ALS didn't improve and didn't give convincing reasons for their silence, The RALO should proceed and propose to ALAC the decertification of the ALS.
    • All the above is applicable to individual members.    
  • Process:
    • An ALS in a "Standby" Status is contacted by the RALO Chair to understand why it is not active
    • During one year, this interaction with the ALS representatives shall continue to bring the ALS back to the RALO activities
    • If, despite all those efforts, the ALS didn't give any sign of improvement, a final warning is sent to the ALS (with the AFRALO list in copy) informing them that the decertification will happen in 6 months if no improvement is made. 
    • In summary, once an ALS reaches the "standby" status, it will spend a year in interaction with the RALO chair for reactivation. if not successful, the ALS will be decertified 6 months later

...