Content Comparison

PROPOSED AGENDA

1.    Welcome & Chair Updates (10 minutes)
       a.    Brief recap from ICANN73 session [icann.zoom.us] – see also https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/2022-March/000336.html
 
2.    Accuracy working definition / construct (30 minutes)
       a.    See staff support team proposal (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/2022-March/000354.html) 
       b.    If staff proposal is not supported under a), review input received (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JGdNLjOjhmJnj-iDaGvcVnv1gZ5tQu5C/edit [docs.google.com]) 
       c.    Review survey responses (see https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdL-R4Tk7pP86bMIRMX1tH1IA9-UgbHFYVJyznlBcQjch99Pg/viewform [docs.google.com])
       d.    Confirm next steps
 
3.       Continue review of Gap Analysis Data Collection Proposals (30 minutes) (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4yvFNAYwQVql7DQob60vX/edit[docs.google.com])
       a.       Review Scoping Team input on proposals (upside, downside and possible next steps)
       b.      Confirm next steps
 
4.    Additional questions for ICANN Compliance (20 minutes) (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1arlKdQkbRkE1LuurmDdd-PZP184_AdFm/edit?pli=1 [docs.google.com]) 
       a.    Introduce questions (Alan, Michael)
       b.    EPDP Team input
       c.    Confirm next steps
 
5.    Confirm action items & next meeting (Thursday 24 March at 14.00 UTC) 

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

For those of you that were not able to attend the ICANN73 session, please review the recording of the meeting (ICANN73 session [icann.zoom.us]). As a reminder:

• RDA Scoping Team Members to review and provide input on the Gap Analysis Proposal Review in light of ICANN73 sessoin (seehttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4yvFNAYwQVql7DQob60vX/edit [docs.google.com]). Note: this document was compiled by Support Staff in an effort to distill the proposals made by Scoping Team Members, including upsides and downsides noted by either the proposer or other team members in subsequent discussions. The document is not meant to restrict the group into choosing one proposal, but rather, the group should review all proposals and see which proposals provide a viable path to forward progress.