Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

What improvements, if any, would you suggest to make the construct of Specific Reviews more effective?  [All comments appear as submitted, without editing.]
More data, sooner. Also, it is important to continue to allow for independent experts to be appointed. The CCT Review team was fortunate enough to have an economist and cybersecurity expert because they were not required to be appointed by an official ICANN community.
Is there a way to assess whether members will actually do the work?
Is there a way to assess whether members will actually do the work?

1. Earlier involvement of board caucus group to access priorities
2. Activity prioritization based in budget schedule
3. Better collaboration tools
4. Better data collection and community support

Information access and sharing, especially with third party entities are always going to help the team to move more rapidly to conclusions.

...