...
Team: Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Carlton Samuels, Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Jordyn Buchanan, Laureen Kapin, Megan Richards, Waudo Siganga,
Drew Bagley, Jonathan Zuck, Jamie Hedlund, Dejan Djukic, Fabro Steibel, Kaili Kan, Calvin Browne
Observers: Zack Coleman
Staff: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez, Brenda Brewer, Pamela Smith, Margie Milam, Brian Aitchison, Eleeza Agopian, Antonietta Mangiacotti
Apologies: David Taylor
Agenda:
- Welcome, roll-call, SoI
- Reach consensus on the definition of Prioritization
- A.O.B.
Documents:
Recordings:
Chat Transcript: EN
Transcript: EN
Notes:
Prerequisite: Must be completed prior to subsequent procedures
- High: Must be completed in the next 18 months after publication of the final report
- Medium: Must be completed in the next 36 months
- Low: Must be completed prior to the next CCT Review
Action Items
- Add hard dates to the prioritization chart; also consider Early, Medium Term and Long Term implementation as category nomenclature
- CCTRT RECS CHART:
Resuts of team voting:
Item 1: Consensus to move to a prerequisite
Item 2: Consensus - low priority
Item 3: Consensus - medium priority
Item 4: Consensus - low priority
Item 5: Consensus - high priority
Item 6: Consensus - low priority
Item 7: Consensus - medium priority
Item 8: (Vote bundled with 9) - Consensus - high priority
Item 9: (Vote bundled with 8) Consensus - high priority
Item 10: Consensus - high priority/near term
(take note of Item 14)
- Changing voting criteria to add near, med, long term timing where appropriate
Item 11: Consensus - medium priority
Item 12: Consensus - prerequisite with clearly defined data set in the final report
Item 13: Consensus - not a prerequisite; medium priority
Item 14: (Bundle with Item 10)
Consensus: high priority
Item 15: edit to add security checks
Consensus - medium priority
Item 16: Consensus - medium priority - move ahead of Item 15
Item 17: Consensus - medium priority
Item 18: Reference data rec also Consensus - prerequisite
Item 19: Consensus - high priority
Item 20: Consensus - high priority
Item 21: Consensus - low priority
Item 22: Consensus - low prioirity
Item 23: Consensus - high priority
- Adjust chart to add highly regulated safeguards with high priority - confer with EA
Item 24: Consensus - high priority
Item 25: Consensus - high priority
Items 26 - 54 to be dealt with next call
Jean-Baptiste to share the recommendations table with the review team, after reporting the priority listed in each paper for all non discussed recommendations.