...
Team: Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Carlton Samuels, Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Jordyn Buchanan, Laureen Kapin, Megan Richards, Waudo Siganga, Drew Bagley
Drew Bagley, Jonathan Zuck, Jamie Hedlund, Dejan Djukic, Fabro Steibel, Kaili Kan, Calvin Browne
Observers: Zack Coleman
Staff: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez, Brenda Brewer, Pamela Smith, Margie Milam, Brian Aitchison, Eleeza Agopian, Antonietta Mangiacotti
Antonietta Mangiacotti
Apologies:
Agenda:
- Welcome, roll-call, SoI
- Reach consensus on the definition of
Prioritization
- A.O.B.
Documents:
Recordings:
Adobe Connect
mp3
Chat Transcript: EN
Transcript: EN
Notes:
Prerequisite: Must be completed prior to subsequent procedures
- High: Must be completed in the next 18 months after publication of the final report
- Medium: Must be completed in the next 36 months
- Low: Must be completed prior to the next CCT Review
Action Items
- Add hard dates to the prioritization chart; also consider Early, Medium Term and Long Term implementation as category nomenclature
- CCTRT RECS CHART:
Resuts of team voting:
Item 1: Consensus to move to a prerequisite
Item 2: Consensus - low priority
Item 3: Consensus - medium priority
Item 4: Consensus - low priority
Item 5: Consensus - high priority
Item 6: Consensus - low priority
Item 7: Consensus - medium priority
Item 8: (Vote bundled with 9) - Consensus - high priority
Item 9: (Vote bundled with 8) Consensus - high priority
Item 10: Consensus - high priority/near term
(take note of Item 14)
- Changing voting criteria to add near, med, long term timing where appropriate
Item 11: Consensus - medium priority
Item 12: Consensus - prerequisite with clearly defined data set in the final report
Item 13: Consensus - not a prerequisite; medium priority
Item 14: (Bundle with Item 10)
Consensus: high priority
Item 15: edit to add security checks
Consensus - medium priority
Item 16: Consensus - medium priority - move ahead of Item 15
Item 17: Consensus - medium priority
Item 18: Reference data rec also Consensus - prerequisite
Item 19: Consensus - high priority
Item 20: Consensus - high priority
Item 21: Consensus - low priority
Item 22: Consensus - low prioirity
Item 23: Consensus - high priority
- Adjust chart to add highly regulated safeguards with high priority - confer with EA
Item 24: Consensus - high priority
Item 25: Consensus - high priority
Items 26 - 54 to be dealt with next call
Jean-Baptiste to share the recommendations table with the review team, after reporting the priority listed in each paper for all non discussed recommendations.